Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Arbitration/Labour Relations Safeway’s banning of union buttons that read ‘Greed-Flation Hurts!’ and ‘I can’t afford to shop here’ did not breach labour code: Board

Safeway’s banning of union buttons that read ‘Greed-Flation Hurts!’ and ‘I can’t afford to shop here’ did not breach labour code: Board

by HR Law Canada

The Alberta Labour Relations Board has dismissed two complaints against grocery giant Sobeys Capital related to controversial buttons that the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) distributed to staff at Safeway and a commercial it produced.

The dispute revolved around a wage reopener clause in the collective agreements, set to be activated six months prior to August 6, 2023. The Union sought to expand the wage negotiations beyond top-rated and over-scale employees to include all employees.

In the lead-up to these negotiations, the Union distributed buttons with messages expressing employees’ concerns about workplace issues and wages. The first set of button had a slogan that read “I Am Still ESSENTIAL.”

Sobeys had no issue with that button, but objected to the second set of buttons UFCW distributed — which included messages like “GREED-FLATION HURTS!” and “I CAN’T AFFORD TO SHOP HERE.”

Consequently, the Employer prohibited the wearing of these buttons at work, leading to the Union filing grievances and the first complaint.

Additionally, the UFCW produced a 30-second commercial featuring Safeway employees, criticizing the employer’s treatment of staff and highlighting wage issues. The commercial, aired on television and social media, led to the suspension and subsequent reinstatement of the employees involved. The Employer responded with a cease and desist letter and a grievance against the union, while the union filed another complaint following the suspensions.

The Board, in its decision, referenced substantial arbitral case law on the wearing of union buttons, balancing employees’ free speech rights with employers’ commercial interests. It found that the Employer’s actions of banning certain buttons and investigating employees did not breach specific sections of the Labour Relations Code, as claimed by the Union.

The Board noted that such actions did not disrupt or intimidate either the Union or the employees in this mature labour relations environment.

The Union’s efforts to frame these actions as violations of the Code were not supported by the Board. It emphasized that neither the current period of inflation nor the ongoing wage negotiations warranted a different interpretation of the Code.

As the Board put it, the current inflation is not unprecedented and does not modify the Code’s interpretation, especially since the wage negotiations have proceeded to interest arbitration.

For more information, see United Food and Commercial Workers Canada Union, Local No. 401 v Sobeys Capital Incorporated, 2024 CanLII 472 (AB LRB).

You may also like