Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Featured Maintenance manager evicted from free apartment after being fired, Saskatchewan tenacies office says it has no jurisdiction over pay

Maintenance manager evicted from free apartment after being fired, Saskatchewan tenacies office says it has no jurisdiction over pay

by HR Law Canada

A landlord in Estevan, Sask., has successfully evicted a maintenance manager it fired from one of its rental units. The worker didn’t pay rent on the unit as it was part of his employment contract.

The landlord terminated the manager, E.C., because it was not satisfied with his services. E.C. agreed he had been let go, but expected to be paid for some of the outstanding work he had done. But this case was argued before the Office of Residential Tenacies Saskatchewan, which pointed out it had no authority over wages earned during employment.

“The parties are also agreed, as am I, that ‘pay’ issues are not within my jurisdiction, and instead must be reported as an Employment Standards Complaint pursuant to The Saskatchewan Employment Act,” the Office said in the ruling. “I did ask the tenant if he challenged his termination, or if he believed he was still employed, and he responded with ‘no’ to both questions.”

As the tenant is no longer employed by the landlord, the tenant is no longer owed the rental unit pursuant to that employment contract, it ruled.

For more information, see 6313248 Manitoba Ltd v Cabral, 2024 SKORT 833 (CanLII).

You may also like