Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Legal News Law Society of British Columbia to challenge constitutionality of province’s new Legal Professions Act

Law Society of British Columbia to challenge constitutionality of province’s new Legal Professions Act

by HR Law Canada

The Law Society of British Columbia has announced it will challenge the constitutionality of the recently enacted Bill 21, the Legal Professions Act. The bill, which received Royal Assent on May 16, 2024, consolidates the regulation of lawyers, notaries, and paralegals under a single body.

The Law Society argues that the new Act undermines the independence of the legal professions and their regulator, a principle it views as essential to democracy. The Act replaces the former Legal Profession Act, which mandated the Law Society to protect public interest by safeguarding the rights and freedoms of all individuals.

The Society and other legal organizations, including the Canadian Bar Association – BC Branch and the Trial Lawyers Association of BC, had previously urged the government to reconsider the bill. They advocated for broader public and professional consultation after the bill was introduced on April 10.

Despite these appeals, and opposition parties expressing concerns over the potential threat to the profession’s independence, the BC government invoked closure to limit debate and passed the legislation.

Law Society President Jeevyn Dhaliwal, KC, criticized the government’s approach, stating, “Not only did government fail to permit full and transparent consultation, they also closed debate on Bill 21 in a manner that suggests they never intended to permit a full and open discussion on the implications of seismic changes that we view as contrary to the public interest.”

The Law Society’s forthcoming litigation will seek to overturn the Act, aiming to restore the previous statutory mandate that emphasizes the protection of public interest and the administration of justice.

You may also like