Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Featured Lawyer accused of ‘solicitor negligence’ in wrongful dismissal case awarded more than $50,000 in costs by Ontario court

Lawyer accused of ‘solicitor negligence’ in wrongful dismissal case awarded more than $50,000 in costs by Ontario court

by HR Law Canada

A lawyer and law firm in Ontario have been awarded more than $50,000 in legal costs in a case where the plaintiff alleged solicitor negligence in a wrongful dismissal case.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice noted that the defendants, Richard Furlong and Furlong Collins, were “wholly successful” in the three-day action. The defendants sought $51,299.61 in costs, all inclusive, on a partial indemnity basis.

“The issues were of importance to both parties,” the court said. “They were particularly important to the defendant and his professional reputation.”

In reaching the decision on costs, Justice Brown considered various factors. The legal premise for awarding costs is to reimburse the successful party, either partially or, in rare cases, fully, for their legal expenses. These costs must be reasonable, proportional to the case, and align with the expectations of the involved parties.

The court noted the experience level of the attorneys involved. The plaintiff’s team comprised two senior counsel, while the defendant’s counsel was recognized for handling the majority of the case work himself, delegating only specific tasks to his law clerk. This delegation was deemed appropriate by Justice Brown.

A pivotal point in the case was the argument from the plaintiffs that their trial costs totaled $27,402.73, referencing a security for costs award of $25,000 ordered four years prior to the trial. However, Justice Brown observed that these figures did not necessarily reflect the cost expectations at the time of the trial.

“The amount claimed in the action was $100,000 and would more appropriately have been brought under the summary proceeding rules,” the court said. “However, the plaintiffs chose to bring their action under the ordinary procedure.”

Highlighting the importance of the issues to both parties, especially to the defendant’s professional reputation, and acknowledging the complexity of the taxation issues involved, Justice Brown awarded costs totaling $51,299.61.

This amount included $41,460 plus HST of $5,389.80, and additional disbursements of $4,449.81. In the judgment, Justice Brown asserted that the awarded amount was reasonable, proportional, and met the expectations of the parties involved.

For more information, see Waters v. Furlong et. al., 2023 ONSC 6715 (CanLII)

You may also like