Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Featured Landlord granted immediate repo of rental unit after unauthorized occupant threatened maintenance worker with physical harm

Landlord granted immediate repo of rental unit after unauthorized occupant threatened maintenance worker with physical harm

by HR Law Canada

The Office of Residential Tenacies in Saskatchewan ordered the immediate repossession of a rental unit in Saskatoon after an unauthorized occupant threatened maintenance staff at the building.

The conflict began on Dec. 7, 2023, when a maintenance worker encountered an aggressive individual at the property owned by Northland Asset Management Company.

“On that date, a maintenance worker for the Landlord was in the building when he encountered an unknown individual,” the Office said in the ruling. “When the worker questioned this person, the person became very rude, aggressive and hostile, subjecting the worker to significant verbal abuse. This individual threatened to physically harm the worker if the worker did not move on. The person then used a key to enter the rental unit.”

The landlord’s agent subsequently learned that the tenant, who was not present at the hearing, had vacated the property and had apparently allowed his brother and another individual to occupy it without authorization.

In seeking possession of the unit, the landlord cited a violation of health, safety, and rights of others under sections 68 and 70 of The Residential Tenancies Act, 2006. The tenant, despite being properly notified of the hearing via email, chose not to attend, leading the adjudicator to proceed in his absence.

The hearing officer determined that the landlord’s claim was proven on a balance of probabilities. However, the issue of proper service to the tenant, who was only notified by email, was also addressed. The Act typically requires personal service or posting of documents on the rental unit’s door, in addition to electronic or regular mail. Despite this, the officer deemed the email service sufficient, noting the tenant’s prompt response to a previous email and the fact that he had not resided in the unit for several months.

The ruling underscored that the tenant, though no longer residing at the property, had the right to dispute the service sufficiency and request a rehearing. However, in the absence of any contrary evidence and considering the urgency of the situation, the hearing officer found it just and equitable to grant the landlord immediate possession of the property.

For more information, see Northland Asset Management v Douglas, 2023 SKORT 3508 (CanLII).

You may also like