Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Featured Ontario Court of Appeal upholds $1.5 million punitive damages award in LTD case against Blue Cross

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds $1.5 million punitive damages award in LTD case against Blue Cross

by HR Law Canada

The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld a $1.5 million punitive damages award, the largest in a Long-Term Disability (LTD) claim in Canada, according to law firm Thomson Rogers.

The ruling in Baker vs. Blue Cross Life Insurance Company of Canada reinforces the jury’s original verdict from a Toronto court, it said.

The case revolves around Sara Baker, who suffered a brain bleed/stroke in 2013. Despite medical advice to the contrary, Blue Cross Life Insurance Company of Canada denied her LTD benefits, asserting she could resume work in an alternative role that paid at least 60% of her pre-disability earnings. The trial concluded with a significant punitive damages award, reflecting the insurer’s misconduct in handling Baker’s LTD claim, it said.

Stephen Birman, a lawyer from Thomson Rogers, represented Baker alongside Robert M. Ben and Lucy Jackson. Birman commented on the court’s decision, emphasizing its impact on enforcing accountability in insurance companies.

“It sends a clear message that misconduct by an insurance company will not be tolerated,” he stated.

Baker expressed relief and gratitude following the ruling. “I’m just grateful this is behind me now,” she said, “and that the court recognized it wasn’t right for me to be treated this way.”

The Court of Appeal found the insurance company “…at best, shows reckless indifference to its duty to consider the respondent’s claim in good faith…and at worst, demonstrates a deliberate strategy to wrongfully deny her benefits, regardless of the evidence that demonstrated an entitlement.”

The court highlighted the essential role of deterrence in such cases, stating, “deterrence is impossible unless the punishment is meaningful.” The judges also acknowledged the gravity of the situation, suggesting that a lesser award would fail to capture senior executives’ attention or deter future misconduct, according to the press release issued by Thomson Rogers.

You may also like