Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Arbitration/Labour Relations Nova Scotia Court of Appeal rejects nurses’ wage dispute grievance, says bargaining – not arbitration – is appropriate forum

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal rejects nurses’ wage dispute grievance, says bargaining – not arbitration – is appropriate forum

by HR Law Canada

The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal by the Nova Scotia Government and General Employees Union (NSGEU) over a salary dispute with the Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA).

It ruled that the matter must be dealt with through bargaining, not grievance arbitration.

The dispute arose when a salary increase negotiated for one job classification of nurses was not applied to others, leading to grievances filed by the NSGEU. The union argued this was a breach of the collective agreement covering public sector nurses in Nova Scotia.

The core of the disagreement stemmed from a 2020 negotiation where a 12 per cent salary increase was granted to Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) employed by the former Capital District Health Authority, effective as of March 17, 2014.

The NSGEU claimed that the increase should also apply to Licensed Practical Nurses working in different classifications, such as Continuing Care Referral Assistants and Operating Room Technicians, across the province to maintain wage parity — a principle they argued was fundamental in Nova Scotia’s health sector.

Arbitrator Susan M. Ashley initially sided with the NSGEU, finding the NSHA’s decision not to extend the wage increase as unreasonable and in breach of the collective agreement. However, Justice Glen G. McDougall of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court later quashed this award, deeming it unreasonable and ordering a new hearing with a different arbitrator.

The appeal court, upholding Justice McDougall’s decision, found that the arbitrator’s ruling did not meet the standards of reasonableness. It was noted that the arbitrator failed to provide a clear reasoning path to justify the decision as a breach of the collective agreement by the NSHA, specifically addressing the management rights clause.

It also said the matter should not be remitted for reconsideration by another arbitrator.

“Where it is evident a particular outcome is inevitable, remitting the matter for reconsideration serves no useful purpose,” the Court of Appeal said. “Although such a scenario is not common this is a circumstance where nothing would be accomplished by having the grievance reconsidered. Article 14.17 of the CBA prohibits an arbitrator from amending or modifying the CBA and this is, in effect, what the NSGEU is seeking.”

The grievance asks for a declaration NSHA breached the CBA by not paying a higher wage to the CCRA classification as well as compensation for the affected employees.

“Even if the arbitrator agrees the differential treatment is unfair, increasing the rates in appendix “A” of the CBA must be dealt with through bargaining, not grievance arbitration,” it said.

The appeal was dismissed. NSHA advised it was not seeking costs, so none were awarded.

For more information, see Nova Scotia Government and General Employees Union v. Nova Scotia Health Authority, 2024 NSCA 42 (CanLII).

You may also like