Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Featured Ontario cabinet maker who sued employer over injuries has case tossed, court says WSIB has exclusive jurisdiction

Ontario cabinet maker who sued employer over injuries has case tossed, court says WSIB has exclusive jurisdiction

by HR Law Canada

An Ontario Superior Court judge has dismissed a lawsuit by a former cabinet maker against a numbered corporation, ruling there is no genuine issue requiring a trial and that the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) holds exclusive jurisdiction over the claims.

The plaintiff, an engineering graduate from India who began working in Ontario in 1991, alleged injuries sustained at work in 2014 led to loss of earnings and wrongful dismissal. However, Justice Shin Doi ruled that the WSIB’s exclusive jurisdiction over workplace injury claims and a statutory limitation period nullify the plaintiff’s lawsuit.

“WSIB has already adjudicated the plaintiff’s claims for loss of earnings and the plaintiff’s actions against WSIB have been dismissed,” stated Justice Shin Doi in the ruling. This decision underscores the WSIB’s role as the primary arbitrator in workplace injuries, leaving no room for parallel litigation in civil courts.

Additionally, claims against other defendants were dismissed due to improper naming and expired limitation periods for filing grievances. Times Kitchen and Times Custom Woodworking were cited as non-legal entities, and no legitimate employment relationship was established with Jose De Sa and 2040766 Ontario Inc., who were also named in the suit.

The plaintiff had sought recompense for alleged discriminatory termination and accommodation failures, but these claims were also barred by the doctrine of res judicata, preventing issues already settled in other tribunals from being relitigated.

“The principles of res judicata and abuse of the court process support dismissal of the plaintiff’s action with respect to the issues of accommodation, discriminatory termination, and forgery,” the judge added. This ruling reinforces the binding nature of previous tribunal decisions and the importance of timely legal action within prescribed limits.

Costs for the proceedings are pending as parties have been given 14 days to make submissions if an agreement on the matter is not reached.

For more information, see Chodha v. Times Kitchen, 2024 ONSC 2384 (CanLII).

You may also like