Home FeaturedMedical clinic engaged in prohibited action when it fired worker who reported sexual harassment, physical assaults
FeaturedOccupational Health & SafetySexual Harassment

Medical clinic engaged in prohibited action when it fired worker who reported sexual harassment, physical assaults

by HR Law Canada
written by HR Law Canada
A+A-
Reset

A medical clinic in British Columbia engaged in prohibited action against a worker after it fired her for making a workplace-safety related complaint, the Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal (WCAT) ...

Free Membership Required

To continue reading, create a free profile and join HR Law Canada's community. Get full access to all non-premium articles.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in below

Want in-depth case law and premium analysis? Upgrade to Premium

HR Law Canada posts are written by the team at North Wall Media, publishers of this media brand.

You may also like

Worker’s last-minute discovery motion in case against Starvoy...

Duty of fair representation case against UFCW dismissed...

Human rights case against City of Peterborough deferred...

Military court fines corporal $500 for drunken behaviour...

HRTO rejects sexual harassment claim filed nearly 4...

Alberta plumber’s union fairly declined to grieve Suncor...

Alberta case manager’s psychological injury claim denied after...

Tribunal reinstates benefits after barrel racing surveillance deemed...

Federal Court rejects work permit application from HR...

Alberta tribunal finds worker who contracted COVID co-operated...