Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Featured Construction foreman cleared of criminal charge in fatal workplace accident by Nova Scotia court

Construction foreman cleared of criminal charge in fatal workplace accident by Nova Scotia court

by HR Law Canada

A construction site foreman has been acquitted of criminal negligence causing death in a 2018 workplace accident by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia.

The incident, which occurred at the Kent Building Supply store construction site in Dartmouth, N.S., has been under scrutiny since the worker’s fall from an 18-foot canopy while installing a weatherproofing membrane known as “blueskin.” The Crown had contended that the foreman’s supervision was criminally negligent, leading to the fatal accident.

However, after a thorough review of the evidence, including testimony from various witnesses and expert opinions, the court found substantial doubt in the foreman’s culpability. The ruling highlighted several key factors:

Worksite safety practices: There was no specific regulation under Nova Scotia’s Occupational Health & Safety Act mandating tie-off protocols when working close to leading edges. The court noted the variability in safety practices across different sites and crews.

The victim’s state: Testimonies from toxicologists suggested that the worker who fell was likely impaired due to marijuana use at the time of the accident, a factor that significantly contributed to the incident.

Industry standards and practices: Evidence showed that the safety measures on the worksite were not markedly different from those on similar sites, making it difficult to establish a “marked and substantial departure” from reasonable conduct expected of a foreman.

After-the-fact conduct: The court did not find the foreman’s post-incident conduct and statements to the police and Occupational Health & Safety officers indicative of guilt.

For more information, see R. v. Gooch, 2024 NSSC 4 (CanLII)

You may also like