Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Featured Sex-based discrimination complaint against B.C.’s Ministry of Health tossed by human rights tribunal

Sex-based discrimination complaint against B.C.’s Ministry of Health tossed by human rights tribunal

by HR Law Canada

The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal has dismissed a complaint against the Ministry of Health, ruling that there is no reasonable prospect of success for the allegations of sex-based discrimination in her employment.

The worker’s complaint, filed on May 1, 2020, alleged that the Ministry discriminated against her based on her sex. The Ministry sought the dismissal of the complaint, arguing it was not filed within the one-year time limit and that there was no reasonable prospect of success.

In a complex decision, the Tribunal found parts of CC’s complaint against a specific individual, referred to as AB, were untimely and dismissed them. The complaint alleged bullying and “misogynistic behaviour” by AB, along with criticisms of the Ministry’s response and its investigations into her complaints.

The Tribunal’s decision to dismiss is anchored in several key findings:

Timeliness of the complaint: The Tribunal determined that the complaint was partially filed on time, specifically the allegations related to the Ministry’s 2019 Investigation Report. However, allegations against AB, dating back to a 2018 meeting, were considered out of time and were not accepted.

Ministry’s investigation: The Tribunal found no reasonable prospect that CC would succeed in proving that the Ministry’s investigations into her complaints were inadequate or biased.

Evidence indicated that the Ministry responded seriously and sensitively to her allegations, including offering counseling and a lateral transfer to a different role.

Connection to sex: Crucially, the Tribunal found no reasonable prospect that CC could establish at a hearing that her sex was a factor in the alleged adverse impacts she suffered. T

he Tribunal noted that while employers are responsible for maintaining a discrimination-free work environment, there was insufficient evidence beyond conjecture to support CC’s claim that her sex influenced the Ministry’s actions or the outcome of its investigations.

The Tribunal emphasized the low threshold for proceeding to a hearing but concluded that the Ministry met its burden of showing there was no reasonable prospect the complaint would succeed.

For more information, see Cotton v. BC Ministry of Health, 2024 BCHRT 5 (CanLII).

You may also like