Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home Wrongful Dismissal Human rights complaint against City of Ottawa over termination dismissed after worker didn’t provide specifics of wrongdoing

Human rights complaint against City of Ottawa over termination dismissed after worker didn’t provide specifics of wrongdoing

by HR Law Canada

A human rights complaint against the City of Ottawa has been dismissed for lack of evidence.

Fadi Al Shikh filed a complaint of discrimination against Ottawa Public Health after being terminated. The application alleged discrimination in employment because of colour, ethnic origin and race contrary to Ontario’s Human Rights Code.

The tribunal sent Al Shikh a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application on April 11, 2022, because there simply wasn’t enough information.

“The Application fails to set out a coherent narrative that explains the particulars of the alleged discrimination and discloses a basis on which the applicant’s allegations are connected to the Code and to the respondent,” wrote adjudicator Joseph Tascona. “The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a concise statement that clearly describes each incident of alleged discrimination in chronological order, including the date, place and people involved.”

Simply put, an employee can’t allege mistreatment without providing specifics.

“A bald assertion that the adverse treatment they received was owing to their enumerated ground is not enough to provide the required factual basis,” wrote Tascona.

The application was dismissed.

For more information see Al Shikh v. Ottawa (City), 2022 HRTO 712 (CanLII).

You may also like